The optimal path of construction was mapped but was not shared/followed by engineering.
The structure of the IWPs is mostly compliant with the Owner procedure.
The criticality of the project resides in its novelty and its potential disruptive impact on extraction activities.
The Foremen also lacked the access to data that would allow them to remove constraints so the plans that they created were typically not executed as they were planned.
The Owner project scheduler has a working model for schedule development
The project was well planned with a detailed schedule developed by the project management team. However the late interaction of the contractors did not allow them to vet the activity dependencies.
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkNo